3 NETWORKING PARADIGMS THAT WOULD AFFECT BUSINESS IN TODAYS ECONOMY
By Annie Odo-Effiong, Client Product
Marketing Manager, Dell.
At a time when IT budgets remain relatively flat, IT
organisations are faced with a number of major shifts in networking that cannot
be ignored. Finding ways to keep pace with this shifting landscape and the
rapid drumbeat of innovation is a challenge certainly, but even for those
without limitless budgets, it’s not one which has to prove insurmountable. IT
organisations must be pragmatic but also consider their technology choices
carefully, protecting existing investments through the use of open technologies
and looking at which projects need to be prioritised in line with the business’
priorities.
Broadly speaking there are three major trends within the
networking space that are currently shaping the industry; convergence,
distributed networking and software defined networks. These topics are not new
to the table, but having been discussed for some time, they are now beginning
to hit the mainstream in terms of the maturity of the technology and where they
are on the corporate agenda.
What characterises and differentiates the networking
space in its ability to respond to these trends is that, unlike the server
space, prices haven’t been driven down by a standardised low-cost architecture
like the x86 platform which opened up and diversified the market. Despite CIOs
being more cost-conscious than ever before, the networking market has instead remained
a market dominated by one major player that has set the pricing agenda in its
own favour and successfully locked customers into its technology.
Many useful new technologies are emerging one of which
is the Dell Virtual Network Architecture (VNA)Portfolio. Adding high-performance server blade
switching expands customers’ architecture options and extends Dell’s abilities
to deliver end-to-end 10 gigabit Ethernet (GbE) solutions across its server, storage andnetworking portfolio. This Dell infrastructure can
deliver up to 10 times greater application performance for decision support and
business intelligence workloads.
Convergence
Convergence is not wholly a networking issue but its
impact on the way networks are managed and – just as importantly – who manages
them, should not be underestimated. Previously IT functioned in silos, with
server, storage and network admins going about their business relatively
independently. When someone within the organisation wanted a new resource
provisioned, working across these silos to make that happen could be a painful
an unnecessarily cumbersome experience.
Virtualization eased this issue to an extent through
its ability to cut across domains and break up these traditional silos.
However, this move has created a new role – the virtualization admin –
challenged with managing a plethora of different technologies from a multitude
of vendors. They
have built their virtualization infrastructure using the traditional approach
of selecting individual platforms (server, storage, and networking) on a
best-of-breed basis and managing the virtual infrastructure using existing
system management tools optimised for the individual platforms and for physical
environments.
In the last several years, a new paradigm for
an x86 virtual computing infrastructure called converged infrastructure has
gained initial acceptance. An ideal converged infrastructure is an integrated
system of compute, storage, networking that is managed holistically by a single
software tool and provides pools of virtualized resources that can be used to
run applications, virtual desktop infrastructure and private clouds.
Where there is some disagreement is around who
‘owns’ the converged infrastructure. Most networking vendors understandably
want to keep control in the hands of network admins, or at least come at the
issue from a very networking-centric perspective. These solutions will allow a
network admin to manage servers, but not necessarily vice versa.
A truly converged solution should offer both
options – server admins should be able to manage the network, while network
professionals should have access to the server infrastructure. Flexible tools
at the switching layer can offer this ability to be configured to fit a
networking based domain or put control in the hands of server admins. Again,
this openness is key to delivering the flexibility required by the business.
Software defined networking
Although the technology is still in its infancy, software
defined networking (SDN) is widely touted to revolutionise network
infrastructures on the same scale as virtualization in the server market.
Traditional networking has been unable to offer the flexibility that networking
managers require today – there is little to no ability for developers to modify
or transform networking devices to provide deep integration between
applications and the network infrastructure. Networking switches have always
worked by routing data using the CPU built into the networking hardware, which
has meant that IT staff have had relatively little control over the flow of
data across a network.
The emergence of SDN has provided IT administrators
with a controller which is decoupled from switch from which they can harness
and shape data traffic flows without having to manually configure individual networking
pieces of hardware. Administrators can take control over entire networks of
switches from this single control plane providing a flexible virtual network
architecture that can keep pace with modern IT demands. This provides a far
more pragmatic approach to network management which eliminates hours of manual
routing and managing policy, whilst providing the ability to respond far more quickly
to business demands.
SDN is relatively new as a concept, but the benefits
are well speculated – networking managers anticipate far diminished reliance on
expensive proprietary networking switches and routers as SDNs can be configured
on less expensive hardware. However the main benefits are from a managerial
flexibility standpoint and Dell has been working with SDN providers to build in
the technology into its Force10 portfolio so that customers are armed with the
right tools when SDN becomes a more mainstream reality.
From traditional to
distributed architectures
Several developments have rendered the traditional
centralised, monolithic chassis-switched network unfit for the modern business’
requirements. Firstly, the workforce has become extremely disperse and mobile. Secondly,
virtualization and cloud computing have resulted in much higher
server-to-server traffic flow than before. Finally, enterprises now have vastly
larger volumes of data to process, store, and analyse than was previously the
case.
Monolithic networks are simply not architected to
efficiently handle this new type of dispersed ‘horizontal’ traffic. Traditional
networks are designed to handle linear ‘north-south’ traffic in and out of the
datacentre. Scaling up these networks is a costly and painful process – adding
switches from one vendor until all the slots are filled and then performing a potentially
disruptive rip-and-replace forklift upgrade. Core switches are the heartbeat of
the network, so enterprises have invariably ended up being locked-in to their
switch vendor long-term.
Alternative distributed approaches, which are more
easily scalable, are now beginning to hit the market. Compared to the
traditional design, the distributed core architecture can be scaled through
low-cost Ethernet switches while the architecture improves reliability by
eliminating the single network point of failure and providing better
performance for any-to-any traffic flow.
However, not all distributed networks are equal and
many networking vendors have taken proprietary approaches to building
distributed networking equipment, locking customers in just as completely as
the monolithic approach. The core may be distributed, but with proprietary
standards, protocols and OS’, the network must be managed as a complete entity,
without any scope for interoperability. However, an open standards approach to
distributed core architectures allows for a much greater degree of flexibility,
allowing IT organisations to mix and match components based on their needs and
budgetary capabilities.
Be open to be successful
The pace of change in networking is exciting and is
creating opportunity for transformation. For too long end-users have been
locked into technologies and cost cycles which have stifled innovation. The
rise of open standards, frameworks and architectures, and a growing realisation
that proprietary models do not have the customers’ best interest in mind is
giving way to new solutions to old and new challenges alike. In the new world
of networking, the future is bright, the future is open.
Annie Odo-Effiong is the Client Product
Marketing Manager of Dell for Anglophone East and West Africa with a
vast experience in the industry having worked as a Territory Sales Consultant
at Hewlett Packard and as a Specialist for Corporate & SME at Celtel
Nigeria Ltd.
0 comments: